<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Peter King moment</title>
	<link>http://bountybowl.com/2008/12/15/your-peter-king-moment/</link>
	<description>What Would Buddy Do?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Thorles</title>
		<link>http://bountybowl.com/2008/12/15/your-peter-king-moment/#comment-60117</link>
		<author>Thorles</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bountybowl.com/2008/12/15/your-peter-king-moment/#comment-60117</guid>
		<description>Could not have said it more eloquently than Pattison Pundit.

I understand King works on a tight deadline for MMQB and thus has limited opportunities to review and confirm all assumptions, proclamations and the like.  Yet each week he throws out a bunch of "I've never seen this" or "No player has ever done this" claims that are easily refuted by the fans of the team/player in question.

My issue: King has arguably the best access of any reporter out there in terms of contacts from league officials to front office to players.  And that's all his column offers: the virtues of that access.  He could use that access and pen a really great Tuesday or Wednesday column but chooses not to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not have said it more eloquently than Pattison Pundit.</p>
<p>I understand King works on a tight deadline for MMQB and thus has limited opportunities to review and confirm all assumptions, proclamations and the like.  Yet each week he throws out a bunch of &#8220;I&#8217;ve never seen this&#8221; or &#8220;No player has ever done this&#8221; claims that are easily refuted by the fans of the team/player in question.</p>
<p>My issue: King has arguably the best access of any reporter out there in terms of contacts from league officials to front office to players.  And that&#8217;s all his column offers: the virtues of that access.  He could use that access and pen a really great Tuesday or Wednesday column but chooses not to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pattison Pundit</title>
		<link>http://bountybowl.com/2008/12/15/your-peter-king-moment/#comment-60116</link>
		<author>The Pattison Pundit</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bountybowl.com/2008/12/15/your-peter-king-moment/#comment-60116</guid>
		<description>Ah, The National Media, who continues to earn a living making thinly researched claims while maintaining the pretentious voice of feigned expertise. I grant that it must be hard to cover all of the bases while writing a column that is supposed to encompass the entire NFL, but this is a bit ridiculous. Sorry Petey, you must not know the Andy Reid I do. What's your next big theory, that Andy will convert to Catholicism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, The National Media, who continues to earn a living making thinly researched claims while maintaining the pretentious voice of feigned expertise. I grant that it must be hard to cover all of the bases while writing a column that is supposed to encompass the entire NFL, but this is a bit ridiculous. Sorry Petey, you must not know the Andy Reid I do. What&#8217;s your next big theory, that Andy will convert to Catholicism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

